Flow mapping
Exhaustive inventory of existing exchanges: systems, protocols, volumes, business criticality.
Enterprise Integrations
Salesforce never runs alone: it exchanges with your ERP, your portals, your master data. We design and harden those exchanges — API strategy, error handling, monitoring, security.
Failing integrations are expensive — in incidents, and in trust in the data.
Flows between Salesforce and the IT landscape have multiplied with no overall picture.
Integration incidents are detected by users, not by monitoring.
Every project chose its own integration method: maintenance has become unmanageable.
Synchronisation errors create lasting data discrepancies between systems.
The security of exchanges — authentication, data exposure — is not under control.
Migrations and upgrades are blocked by poorly understood dependencies.
From mapping the current state to an integration framework your teams maintain on their own.
Exhaustive inventory of existing exchanges: systems, protocols, volumes, business criticality.
Integration styles, reference patterns and enterprise standards, adapted to your teams.
Design of detection, retry and escalation: no silent failures.
Flow monitoring, logging, alerting: incidents are seen before users call.
Review of authentication, authorisation, secrets management and sensitive data exposure.
Integration choices formalised as ADRs, so future projects start from an established framework.
A complete integration reference, usable by your teams and your vendors.
A factual sequence: inventory, analysis, target, handover.
Flows, systems, interface contracts, incident history.
Fragility points, integration debt, gaps against good practice.
API strategy, reference patterns, error handling, observability.
Documentation, architecture decisions, team enablement.
Typical situations we address.
A pharmaceutical group connects Salesforce to its ERP, billing and portals. The integration strategy hardens those critical exchanges and clarifies responsibilities.
A retail company suffers recurring data discrepancies between systems. The review identifies the structural causes and puts detection, retry and monitoring in place.
A CIO prepares the replacement of a core system connected to Salesforce. The flow mapping secures the transition without interrupting exchanges.
What architects and operations leads ask us.
Not on principle. The strategy starts from your needs, your in-house skills and your existing landscape. The tool is a consequence of the architecture, not a starting point.
Both. Hardening a fragile existing landscape is a frequent case: mapping, error handling, observability, then remediation prioritised by business criticality.
System-to-system authentication, secrets management, authorisation, sensitive data exposure and access traceability. With prioritised recommendations.
That is the design goal. Standards, documentation and decision records are written so that your teams — and your vendors — are autonomous.
By choosing appropriate patterns: batch processing, event-driven architecture, retry queues. Salesforce platform limits are built into the design, not discovered in production.
Describe your integration landscape. Together we will identify where to start.